Here's the thing about building AI for security compliance: it's really easy to get it wrong. Not just a little wrong. Completely wrong.

You see, when someone asks for help with ISO 27001 or GDPR, they're not looking for theoretical knowledge. They need practical guidance that works in their specific context. They need something they can actually use.

And that's exactly why we're constantly asking for feedback.

Not the "rate us 5 stars" kind of feedback. Real, honest feedback about whether our guidance actually helped someone implement a control, write a policy, or prepare for an audit.

Every time someone tells us "this wasn't practical enough" or "you missed the point", we learn. We adjust. We get better at providing guidance that matters.

It's not about making our AI look smart. It's about making someone's compliance journey less painful.

Because at the end of the day, if we're not making security compliance easier for real people in real organizations, what's the point?

That's why we'll keep asking. That's why we'll keep learning. That's why we'll keep improving.

And yes, I'm about to do it again: would you mind sharing your feedback about ISMS Copilot today? **https://tally.so/r/31ErlW**